Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1001220070090010053
Journal of the Korean Society of Digital Medical Imaging Technology
2007 Volume.9 No. 1 p.53 ~ p.65
A Study on Quality Assurance(QA) Guideline for Diagnostic Monitor
Son Gi-Gyeong

Sung Dong-Wook
Jung Hae-Jo
Jeong Jae-Ho
Kang Hee-Doo
Shin Jin-Ho
Lee Sun-Geun
Kim Yong-Hoan
Abstract
PACS has been run at the Kyung Hee University Medical Center(KHMC) since 2001, and the installation and operation of PACS have contributed to automation and quantification of KHMC¡¯s medical environment. During these five years our greatest concern is how to make our own guiding principle of diagnostic monitor QA which is adapted to international standards. In accordance with the terms of ¡¯KHMC QA Guideline¡¯, ¡¯AAPM TG18¡¯, ¡¯SMPTE RP133¡¯, ¡¯DICOM Part14¡¯, ¡¯DIN V 6868-57¡¯, ¡¯JESRA X-0093¡¯, ¡¯JIS Z4752-2-5¡¯ and ¡¯KCARE¡¯, concern about quality assurance of medical images are on the increase. With the investigation of acceptance testing and quality control of international standards for medical display devices, and data collection and analysis for recommended guideline, it is reported that acceptance testing(quality control), including geometrical distortion, display reflection, luminance response, luminance uniformity, display resolution, display noise, veiling glare and color chromaticity being adequate and effective to domestic hospital environments for medical display devices and assessment methods according to each performance. Accordingly, KHMC classified the checkpoint items by period, at the time of monitor setting, monthly, quarterly, half-yearly and annually. Periodic classfication of checkpoint items for monitor QA makes a good guideline for image QA/QC and useful guideline for persistent good quality of monitor.
KEYWORD
Diagnostic monitor, QA Guideline, Periodic classfication, Checkpoint item
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information